文章摘要
王荣达,张琰,郝信鹏,杨金权.基于DNA条形码的武夷光唇鱼物种有效性[J].上海海洋大学学报,2022,31(4):858-864.
WANG Rongda,ZHANG Yan,HAO Xinpeng,YANG Jinquan.Species validity of Acrossocheilus wuyiensis based on DNA barcode[J].Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2022,31(4):858-864.
基于DNA条形码的武夷光唇鱼物种有效性
Species validity of Acrossocheilus wuyiensis based on DNA barcode
投稿时间:2021-04-26  修订日期:2021-06-11
DOI:10.12024/jsou.20210403418
中文关键词: 台湾光唇鱼  线粒体COⅠ基因  同物异名  ASAP法  物种界定
英文关键词: Acrossocheilus paradoxus  mitochondrial COⅠ  synonym  ASAP method  species delimitation
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31872207)
作者单位E-mail
王荣达 上海海洋大学 海洋动物系统分类与进化上海高校重点实验室, 上海 201306
上海海洋大学 水产种质资源发掘与利用教育部重点实验室, 上海 201306 
 
张琰 上海海洋大学 海洋动物系统分类与进化上海高校重点实验室, 上海 201306
上海海洋大学 水产种质资源发掘与利用教育部重点实验室, 上海 201306 
 
郝信鹏 上海海洋大学 海洋动物系统分类与进化上海高校重点实验室, 上海 201306
上海海洋大学 水产种质资源发掘与利用教育部重点实验室, 上海 201306 
 
杨金权 上海海洋大学 海洋动物系统分类与进化上海高校重点实验室, 上海 201306
上海海洋大学 水产种质资源发掘与利用教育部重点实验室, 上海 201306 
jqyang@shou.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 2271
全文下载次数: 1343
中文摘要:
      以线粒体COⅠ基因全序列为分子标记分析中国台湾省分布的台湾光唇鱼(Acrossocheilus paradoxus)和闽江分布的武夷光唇鱼(A.wuyiensis)的物种有效性。光唇鱼属(Acrossocheilus)6个种76尾样本的COⅠ基因全序列共获得21个单倍型,采用最大简约法(MP)、最大似然法(ML)和贝叶斯法(BI)构建的系统发育树表明,台湾光唇鱼和武夷光唇鱼构成单系群。K 2-P遗传距离分析显示台湾光唇鱼与武夷光唇鱼之间平均遗传距离仅为0.853%,远小于COⅠ条形码在物种间的2%遗传距离阈值。以ASAP物种界定法分析结果显示台湾光唇鱼和武夷光唇鱼为同一物种。因此,闽江分布的武夷光唇鱼与台湾光唇鱼应为同一物种,武夷光唇鱼为台湾光唇鱼的同物异名。
英文摘要:
      Previous studies have shown that Acrossocheilus paradoxus from Taiwan and A. wuyiensis from Minjiang River are closely related species, and they are difficult to distinguish in morphological characteristics. Therefore, the validity of the two species is still controversial. In the present study, completemitochondrial COⅠ gene sequences were used to investigate the species validity of A. paradoxus and A. wuyiensis. A total of 21 haplotypes were obtained from 76 samples of 6 species in the genus. Phylogenetic trees constructed by maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian (BI) methods showed that the two species formed a monophyletic group. Genetic distance analysis showed that the average Kimura 2-parameter distance between A. paradoxu s and A.wuyiensis was only 0.853%, far less than the 2% genetic distance threshold of DNA barcode among species. The ASAP method we also used to build species partitions, the result shows the two species were classified as the same species. Therefore, A.wuyiensis distributed in Minjiang River and A. paradoxus distributed in Taiwan should be a same species, and A.wuyiensis is the synonym of A. paradoxus.
HTML 查看全文   
关闭