基于环境DNA和底拖网调查的海州湾海洋牧场鱼类多样性比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S931.1

基金项目:

南海岛礁渔业资源生态化开发项目(2024YFD2401803);海州湾国家级海洋牧场示范区年度监测及5年复查评估项目(XSDCG20250061);中国博士后科学基金(2024TI70542);国家资助博士后研究人员计划(GZC20231539);自然资源部海洋生态保护与修复重点实验室/福建省海洋生态保护与修复重点实验室开放基金(EPR2024007)


Comparison of fish diversity in marine ranching in Haizhou Bay based on environmental DNA and bottom trawl surveys
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了评估海州湾海洋牧场渔业资源养护效果并比较环境DNA(eDNA)技术与底拖网在复杂生境中的监测调查能力,于2024年春季(4月)和秋季(10月)在该海域人工鱼礁区与对照区同步开展了eDNA水样采集(表层、底层)与底拖网调查。通过物种组成分析、多样性指数计算以及主坐标分析(PCoA)、相似性百分比分析(SIMPER)和冗余分析(RDA)等统计分析方法,解析鱼类群落结构差异及其与环境因子的关系。结果表明:(1)eDNA检出的鱼类物种数(春季28种、秋季45种)均高于底拖网调查(春季19种、秋季22种);(2)春季鱼礁区与对照区生物群落无显著差异,秋季鱼礁区生物表层多样性显著低于底层,且两区鱼类组成差异显著;(3)水温与盐度是影响秋季群落分布的关键环境因子;(4)两种方法在群落均匀度上表现一致,但eDNA存在引物偏好性与漏检,底拖网调查则受捕捞效率及鉴定误差限制。研究表明,eDNA在物种检测效率上优于底拖网调查,尤其适用于复杂生境,但无法获取生物学样本;二者结合可互补不足,更全面揭示鱼类群落特征。本研究为今后海州湾海洋牧场资源监测与生态管理提供科学参考。

    Abstract:

    In order to evaluate the fishery resource conservation effects of the Haizhou Bay Marine Ranching and compare the monitoring and survey capabilities of environmental DNA (eDNA) technology and bottom trawling in complex habitats, simultaneous eDNA water sample collection (surface and bottom layers) and bottom trawl surveys were conducted in the artificial reef area and the control area of this sea area in spring (April) and autumn (October) 2024. Statistical analysis methods such as species composition analysis, diversity index calculation, Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA), Similarity Percentage Analysis (SIMPER), and Redundancy Analysis (RDA) were used to analyze the differences in fish community structure and their relationships with environmental factors. The results showed that: (1) The number of fish species detected by eDNA (28 in spring, 45 in autumn) was higher than that detected by bottom trawling (19 in spring, 22 in autumn); (2) There was no significant difference in biological communities between the reef area and the control area in spring, while in autumn, the surface layer diversity in the reef area was significantly lower than that in the bottom layer, and the fish composition significantly differed between the two areas; (3) Water temperature and salinity were key environmental factors influencing the community distribution in autumn; (4) The two methods performed consistently in terms of community evenness, but eDNA exhibited primer bias and missed detections, while bottom trawling was limited by fishing efficiency and identification errors. The study indicates that eDNA outperforms bottom trawling in species detection efficiency, particularly in complex habitats, but cannot obtain biological samples; combining the two methods can compensate for their shortcomings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of fish community characteristics. This research provides a reference for future resource monitoring and ecological management of the Haizhou Bay marine ranching.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

贾天杭,赵泽,路吉坤,伏光辉,卢璐,高世科,张硕.基于环境DNA和底拖网调查的海州湾海洋牧场鱼类多样性比较[J].上海海洋大学学报,2026,35(4):1010-1023.
JIA Tianhang, ZHAO Ze, LU Jikun, FU Guanghui, LU Lu, GAO Shike, ZHANG Shuo. Comparison of fish diversity in marine ranching in Haizhou Bay based on environmental DNA and bottom trawl surveys[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2026,35(4):1010-1023.

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-15
  • 最后修改日期:2026-01-22
  • 录用日期:2026-01-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-04
  • 出版日期: 2026-07-31
文章二维码
关闭